News, sports, politics, blogs and forums for Shakopee, Minnesota • (952) 445-3333 •  Follow us on Twitter

Shakopee Resident's GuideLocal Worship DirectoryShakopee Foreclosure Data

Shakopee, Minnesota

Keep up with Shakopee News! Sign up for email newsletters and RSS feeds.
Click to Login
No account? Sign up!

Advertising

Advertising

Chaska firm plans wind-generated power line


» Read similar stories filed under:

Chaska-based, Outland Renewable Energy LLC (Outland) announced today it plans to build a community-owned wind-generated power line focused on moving wind energy from the wind-belt of southwest Minnesota to the Twin Cities area.

Outland is a non-utility, private company and will finance the Minnesota Independence Line itself.

The company said the line will significantly increase the wind energy resources available to meet the increasing demand for clean, renewable energy and will help Minnesota meet its Renewable Energy Standard, which states 25 percent of the state's electricity will come from renewable energy sources by 2025.

"Outland is proud of its mission to harness the power of wind, creating a clean, safe and secure energy future for our communities," said Ingrid Bjorklund, vice president of government affairs and associate general counsel for Outland Renewable Energy. "We are tackling the transmission bottleneck with an innovative solution to get the state's abundant wind energy to market sooner."

The Minnesota Independence Line will be a high-voltage transmission line approximately 150 miles in length, running from the Buffalo Ridge area to the Twin Cities area.

The wind line will have the potential to move up to 3,000 megawatts of wind out of the wind-rich Buffalo Ridge region, said the company.

Outland hopes to have the line operational in 2012. The company says that this will help the state meet the first milestone in the Renewable Energy Standard, which is 12 percent by 2012.

Advertisement. Article continues below.

Outland said its transmission line is also community focused. Outland envisions that landowners along the transmission route will embrace and participate in community ownership. That, it said, will enable those communities in Minnesota that do not have the same abundant wind resource that exists in southwestern Minnesota to share the economic benefits of the state's wind energy resources.

"This is a community endeavor where we will actively reach out to our communities to discuss every step of the project," Bjorklund said. "Outland has the expertise and financial strength to deliver the potential of wind energy to Minnesota and revitalize our rural communities."

The transmission grid in southwest Minnesota is at its maximum capacity and cannot support the significant increase in new wind energy that will be needed to meet Minnesota's Renewable Energy Standard, said the company. It added that the transmission congestion in that area is causing a backlog of projects, which is inhibiting wind farms from fully developing.

 




It's for wind - NOT!!!...

Back to page top

It's for wind - NOT!!! Methinks somebody better remind Outland, and this paper, that under FERC rules, they cannot "discriminate" against generators, meaning that if wind, coal, nuclear, turkey turd, or whatever fuel source wants transmission and is in the MISO queue, completes transmission studies and gets interconnection authorization, they've got to let it on the line. So if the Big Stone II coal plant wants to connect, they've got to let it.

Also, a private company does not have power of eminent domain to take land for transmission lines.

Oh, and this story should also report that Ingrid Bjorklund is a registered lobbyist for Big Stone II. What interests is she representing here?

It matters because Big Stone II's transmission is now under scrutiny at the Minnesota PUC, and they've not proven that the coal plant is needed, the permit is being contested -- the BSII transmission studies, Phase 5, show that it can't interconnect as proposed, and are now including CapX 2020 in the studies. They can't connect without CapX. South Dakota recently authorized a "just in case" transmission line on the eastern side of the state. Now here's an announcement for this Outland Renewable Energy "it's for wind" line. Hmmmmmm, funny how that works... more correctly, we know it doesn't. You can't have "it's for wind" lines, coal will have access too. It's the law. That's why big wind should be sited by gas peaking plants, to utilize available transmission infrastructure and transmission reservations. Put the wind where it can be connected -- and that's all over the state. Look at substation loading. You don't have to build on Buffalo Ridge, you don't have to run transmission over landowners, and you don't have to pay big bucks for building transmission. Wind developers can build in areas with lower speed wind resource that has transmission access.

Carol A. Overland
Transmission Attorney
www.nocapx2020.info
www.legalectric.org


Submitted by CAOverland on December 26, 2007 - 1:22pm.

Sounds as if Ms. Overland...

Back to page top

Sounds as if Ms. Overland has the facts and the power line scheme smells a front for a proposed big new coal unit in South Dakota.

Maybe a little more investigation is called for?

am


Submitted by amuller on December 26, 2007 - 1:47pm.

Advertising

Advertising

Recent comments

Advertising

Who's new

  • Outsider
  • Amanda Steele
  • OrlyMaldonado
  • Sarah Koehler
  • CatherineTribue

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 134 guests online.

Advertising

Advertising